by Peter Panepento
GlobalErie reader Richard Herman pointed me to an interesting column from Elizabeth Sullivan, the foreign affairs columnist and associate of the Cleveland Plain Dealer.
There are many who believe that America needs to adopt a protectionist mindset to hold on to what is left of its manufacturing might — and to grow in the future.
Sullivan offers an interesting counter argument.
Here’s an excerpt:
U.S. technology policies are failing. But they are failing not because they don’t do enough to hold in technology. They are failing because they do too little to create a climate for new investments and high-tech jobs.
Technology and brainpower cannot be bottled up like wine.
Instead of trying to cast a net of protectionism around the U.S. economy, the presidential contenders - in partnership with rust-belt cities like Cleveland - need to get smart about using high-tech visas and high-tech jobs as a lure for growth and a magnet for entrepreneurial immigration. Without that forward thinking, the innovation that immigrants can help incubate will remain untapped and immigrants will continue to be the pointless, populist punching bag for economic failure.
For those whose American dream has dissolved into a nightmare of foreclosed homes, squeezed wages and mounting debt, it’s easy to portray immigrants as the force that’s holding down wages and siphoning off jobs instead of the means to revitalize manufacturing regions like Cleveland.
But that’s only because too many of us forget how immigrant brainpower and energy helped make America the innovation powerhouse it is today.
In Cleveland, a stellar opportunity presents itself right now to use the political pressure possible in a presidential year to carve out an Ohio experiment in just what high-tech immigration could again do for one economically hurting region of America.
I encourage you to read the rest.
I also encourage you to think about how the manufacturing economy was built in Erie in the first place. It was largely through immigrants.
Food for thought.
After more than six years working as a journalist in Erie, I'm now the web editor for the Chronicle of Philanthropy in Washington, D.C., and the publisher of GlobalErie.com. I still maintain close ties to Erie - a community that I care about deeply. I hope this Web site can help inspire a better future for Erie.
Jim Russell
September 3rd, 2008 at 12:06 pm
Protectionism isn’t a policy for economic development. It is a knee-jerk reaction to hard times, using fear as fuel. Populism is almost always self-destructive.
Dale Hannah
September 3rd, 2008 at 12:47 pm
People tend to forget that save for a few Native Americans, we are all descended from immigrants. They are the ones who came to this country to build a better life for themselves and their followers, and the ones who made this country such a great place. Where would we all be today had they not come over? What if the Indians had won the battles?
Let’s not force them to come illegally, but help them to do it properly and learn to make a contribution to our society.
john morris
September 3rd, 2008 at 1:45 pm
Peter, This should be one of the top subjects on here.
Countries like Canada, Austrailia and Singapore are aggressively recruiting high value educated immigrants. This is one of the most crucial weapons in our economic arsenal and we need to use it while people like that still want to come here, invest and start businesses.
Lee Kwan Yew, recently pointed out Singapore’s edge on countries like Japan is it’s openess to new immigrants.
I also want to repeat a point, I’ve tried to make here before. Immigrants from both inside and outside the country , can be very important for urban areas because most of them don’t have the anti urban biases common in the U.S. When a lot of NYC’s white middle class dumped their houses for the suburbs, waves of immigrant’s happily took them off their hands.
Jim Berlin
September 3rd, 2008 at 2:54 pm
Peter,
I wholeheartedly agree. The many immigrants who have come to work at Logistics Plus bring a terrific attitude, work ethic, smarts, a love of the opportunity of working and living here in Erie/America.
It is a shame that it is so hard for them to get visas here. Like our grandparents before them, they work hard, live in places others have fled, make a living, give their kids a chance at a better future, pay taxes, add to the culture of our (as John Morris points out rightfully) immigrant nation.
I agree this would be a terrific thing to push for if we can find ways to open the door to skilled foreign workers who want to become part of the American experience.
JB
Heavy D
September 4th, 2008 at 3:31 pm
The United States allows more legal immigrants to come in than all the other industrialized countries of the world combined. Too bad we have an anti European immigration policy ( more likely to get higher educated people from 1st world countries) I am all for recruiting the ones we need that will contribute in a positive way. BUT this doesn’t mean we should open up to all the illegals coming in.
Peter Panepento
September 4th, 2008 at 3:33 pm
I don’t believe anyone is arguing that here.
john morris
September 4th, 2008 at 3:50 pm
I haven’t had time to check Jim’s facts but he put up an interesting statistic regarding Minneapolis St Paul, which backs up the idea that labor mobility is critical.
“I don’t have any best selling books to legitimize my brain drain crusade, but I do have numbers. They will do in a pinch. The US Census looked at the domestic migration of the young, single and college educated from the period of 1995-2000. In 2000, the MSAs of Cleveland and Minneapolis-St. Paul had about the same total population. However, about 2,500 more of the young, single and college educated left the Twin Cities metro than left Cleveland. But double of this golden demographic moved into Minnesota’s largest city region than relocated to Greater Cleveland.”
Heavy D, a look at the campuses of any leading university will likely show the dominance of Asian, South Asian and other non European students- in spite of the fact affirmative action programs limit their entrance. I think, U.C. Berkeley, for example would have a student population close to 80% Asian and Asian American if applications were awarded purely by merit. Many of these kids would like to stay in the U.S. but can’t. I would guess that Sanford, MIT and CMU would have similar enrollments.
Austrailia, wher my mom lived, until fairly recently, had an explicit policy favoring European Imigration, which I think they now see was a big mistake.
However, I do agree with you that, the bias of the current legal system towards family unification over everything else should be tilted back to one which values skills and education more.
Heavy D
September 5th, 2008 at 7:57 am
I was referring to those coming in already educated with a degree. Not those that come here to get one.
john morris
September 5th, 2008 at 1:51 pm
I really don’t understand what you are trying to say at all. Many, many, many non European people come here and apply to come here who have degrees. India’s IIT degree for example is probably the gold standard of technology undergrad degrees. Also as far as I know, students come here with a student visa and then a high percentage apply for a permanent visa and can’t get one–and then they head back to their own country with the degree they got here.
It’s hard to take the whining about population loss seriously in Pittsburgh when one comonly meets students who want to stay here after they graduate that tell you they have such a low shot at getting a permanent visa.