by Peter Panepento
If you watched any of the early speeches during last night’s Democratic National Convention, you likely noticed that there was a lot of discussion about investing in green technologies.
The idea that, as a nation, we should prioritize technologies that reduce our dependence on foreign oil and would have the added benefit of creating new domestic manufacturing opportunities.
This is a topic I’ve been drumming on since before we launched this Web site. And last night’s barrage of speeches reminded me of a year-ago post that I want to resurface.
Here’s a portion of it:
I believe Erie can make something happen by focusing on some of the competitive advantages we already have.
Why not create a center for the research of green manufacturing, which would create new, environmentally friendly replacements for existing products? The offshoot of this center — other than jobs for those people conducting the research — would be spinoff companies that would manufacture and sell products created from that research.
GE Transportation is already at the forefront of this type of business. So is Railpower Technologies — a company with a major engineering presence in Erie.
Erie has several environment-related projects in the works at the old International Paper plant — and it has smaller startups such as Spinworks that already give Erie a cluster of companies that are working in this emerging industry.
Erie has institutions such as Gannon University and Penn State Behrend that are already investing in projects to improve technology education and business startups in the region.
Erie even has an influx of government money through the new casino that can and should be used to help fuel job growth and investment.
And let’s not forget the excitement about the potential of a new discovery by Millcreek entrepreneur John Kanzius.
It’s time to put these elements together to create something truly different and meaningful.
Let’s find a way to bring these resources together to help Erie build for the future — and create opportunities for many of those who really want to live there.
If you have a thought on this, please post a comment — and let’s show Erie’s leaders that there are some progressive ideas out there. Maybe this idea will work. Maybe there’s a better one out there. But let’s stop focusing on the day-to-day and start thinking about a new a better future.
Erie clearly has an opportunity to be at the forefront of a new American economic renaissance — if it positions itself properly and is willing to make some investments in forward-thinking economic development.
Let’s stop dickering over casinos, convention centers, and tire incinerators.
Instead, let’s start thinking about how we can create an environment that will leverage some of Erie’s strategic strengths into something much larger.
After more than six years working as a journalist in Erie, I'm now the web editor for the Chronicle of Philanthropy in Washington, D.C., and the publisher of GlobalErie.com. I still maintain close ties to Erie - a community that I care about deeply. I hope this Web site can help inspire a better future for Erie.
AM
August 27th, 2008 at 11:40 am
This definately could be Erie’s - and the Rust Belt’s - golden ticket.
Jim Russell
August 27th, 2008 at 12:42 pm
Jim’s comment in the Double Brain Drain post has me seeing synergy:
“High speed rail development is one area I’d be interested in hearing more about locally, as well as other non air related public transportation options. We have engineering capability within the community for transportation initiatives, and Amtrak is currently illustrating there is a growing market for that kind of service, setting passenger records.”
Green transportation would seem to be a strong economic niche for Erie. Check the Ohio Hub project:
http://www.ohiohub.org
Jim
August 27th, 2008 at 1:15 pm
I checked the link, certainly an interesting project. Made me think of some of the things Ken Springirth used to advocate. I wonder if there is a way to get something going locally with that, or something like that.
Wizo
August 27th, 2008 at 3:59 pm
seems Ohio has ‘left the station’ on this idea.
George Vietze
August 28th, 2008 at 9:57 am
This forward thinking is a breath of fresh air compared to the rear-view mirrow thinking of the past. Focusing on Erie’s current assets makes sense because they already have located in this area and have the investment incentive to maximize their potential. This idea needs a coalition of forces or an organizational structure that will focus on the implementation of the necessary steps to transform and manifest reality. I had hopes that Envision Erie would create the umbrella that would allow community residents to join the organization and contribuite ideas and talent. I attented one meeting, but at that one meeting ideas were put forth, notes and minutes were immediately written down, goals and ideas to be pursued were given direction and people assigned to follow through and I envisioned that following meetings would follow through on the progress of those assignments which would lead to other ideas and methods of implementing those goals. Writing about these goals is a “first step” of the idea generating process, unless followed up by structure and implementation it ends up being an archive of ideas that lose focus as time passes by. Positive focus manifests reality. This site (global Erie) has proven to me that the floating of ideas and follow of those ideas through creates results.
The organizational idea needs sponsor/sponsors from private business that will attract the local talent to move forward. Are there any ideas on organizational structure that would form the umbrella for the community to get underneath that would have the follow-through and accountability of its goals and agenda? This is too good of an “idea”
that already has a public forum and platform (globaleirie) to just add to the past list of archives, my guess is that it already is being worked on by someone or organization in this area and just needs additional focus to make it happen. It took a while before the community got fully behind the Cancer Institute’s new research, if we expand our green-energy potential together with the expansion of cancer research project Erie could move to a new level of community progress.
anonymous
August 28th, 2008 at 11:12 am
Green is not always so good. Be carefuel what you wish for. The biodiesel plant is as green as it gets but the biodiesel industry is in the toilet and palnts are shutting down across the US. An expensive biodiesel plant could turn out to be the biggest white elephant Erie has ever seen. People can not afford to pay $6.00 per gallon when they can get regular diesel at $4.50 per gallon. With no customers in the US and the Europeans enacting an anti-dumping law to prevent US biodiesel plants from dumping biodiesel in Europe what are they going to do? Also, the $1.00 tax credit goes way in Decmeber..
Jim Russell
August 29th, 2008 at 3:26 pm
More about high-speed rail for Cleveburgh:
http://defendyoungstown.blogspot.com/2008/08/valley-leaders-pursue-high-speed-rail.html
Dale Hannah
August 29th, 2008 at 3:48 pm
The fact that the BioDiesel plant is shipping lots of biofuel to Rotterdam is different HOW, than all the crap that has been dumped on the US in the last 50 years? The dependence on foreign oil must end, but we must still feed the millions of autos that ply our highways, no? And until the day that a satisfactory alternative is developed, biofuel has the ability to lessen that dependence. We need the car makers to speed up the conversion to using biofuel along with regular gasoline.
Forget about cost, Mr. Anonymous, no matter if we use natural gas, oil or biofuel, the bucks will be flying from your wallet and mine.
john morris
August 29th, 2008 at 4:29 pm
Well ,there we have the problem in a nutshell. We are broke and we must make choices. We can’t afford both a great high speed rail system and all the subsidies needed to keep the federal highway system going.
So, the rational solution which is to cut back to the things that can pay for themselves is likely to be thrown under the truck so we can do every hair brained scheme to keep our cars.
To be honest with you, it’s time for the private rail industry to go to court to stop all the subsidies to it’s statist competitor.This is the core problem of all government spending. No matter how bad and irrational a program is, it carries with it it’s own constituency.
Dale Hannah
August 29th, 2008 at 5:55 pm
I agree with you, John, but what do we do in the meanwhile? Any light rail or high-speed rail system is going to take many years to have any usability. I’ve used the transit in Toronto and Washington DC. It is by far the best way to go. Toronto has Rail from the outskirts, Trolley and the Metro, in the City. I would take advantage of it in a second if it were to be put in use here. The big difference between Erie and the cities with usable mass-transit, is that other places strive to make their cities
walkable and the transit inexpensive and convenient. Then again, the parking in those cities is prohibitive, which will encourage the use of the public transit. Erie just keeps building ramp after ramp, and people bitch if they can’t jump out of their cars right at the front door of the stores. If you read into my comment just a little deeper, I said “until a satisfactory alternative is available.” A convenient high-speed rail coupled with a decent bus system would be the ideal alternative.
john morris
August 29th, 2008 at 6:30 pm
I don’t have time to give a detailed response right now. But, the key thing is to realise we made a mistake and stop digging deeper into the same hole.
The private rail industry is in the midst of a big building boom. Sending the clear message that subsidies for most of the road system are on the way out would encourage massive investment. I think some roads should have a clear date of death stamped on them so people can plan the alternatives.
The general rule should be that any road that can be sold and run as a private toll road can survive but I don’t think many make the cut. Remember that many of these roads have precious rights of way. Route 80 for example would make a fine right of way for NY- Midwest rail.
To be honest with you, from my knowledge- if any industry deserves some kind of break as restitution for it’s treatment it is the private rail industry which was the victim of drastic price controls (the ICC), forced union work rule expenses and the federal creation of a tax subsidised competitor. The whole long haul trucking industry is a scam.