by Peter Panepento
I was reminded of Dale Hannah’s recent post political plea bargains on What If? over the weekend when I read some of the stories about the state employees who are facing charges that they were part of a scheme to give improper bonuses to employees of the Pennsylvania Legislature.
I’ve written before about how public officials should be held to a higher standard when it comes to following the law and not abusing their power.
Hannah’s post had a similar tone in questioning the recent case involving former state Rep. Linda Bebko-Jones of Erie. I invite you to check it out — and to read the comments, as well.
One of Hannah’s readers, Ron, had what I think is a great idea for making public officials more accountable. He proposes jacking up the penalties for public officials who abuse their power:
For instance, if you use your power as a Congressman/woman to commit an offense, you should receive at least 1.5x the jail time/fine that you would have received for the same crime that a normal citizen would have received. Those who make our laws have the utmost responsibility to abide by them, and to abuse your power and break the trust of the people is a crime itself. I think if you want to seek public office, you need to remember that you work for the people, not for your own gains.
Would this work? Should public officials be held to a different standard? As always, I welcome your thoughts.
After more than six years working as a journalist in Erie, I'm now the web editor for the Chronicle of Philanthropy in Washington, D.C., and the publisher of GlobalErie.com. I still maintain close ties to Erie - a community that I care about deeply. I hope this Web site can help inspire a better future for Erie.
James A
July 14th, 2008 at 10:26 am
Just as to whether or not it would work - it would increase incentive for legislators to decrease maximum sentences for white-collar crime (the sort that they generally commit). I’m not sure if that would be such a great thing. And would this apply to everything, parking tickets too?
Just in general, I do think that the law ought to be applied equally to everybody. I ought to have all the same rights and protections as the Congressman - and the Congressman ought to have all the same rights and protections as me.
bojosmom
July 14th, 2008 at 11:01 am
I agree with James. Rights , responsiblities, and protections should be equal under the law for us all. This is why Lady Justice is blind[at least in theory], is it not?
It is ironic that you choose this topic today as our neighborhood was just the victim of senseless vandalism in the form of tire-slashings and I wrote out my frustrations with the vandals by wishing that after apprehension they pay not only for the tire replacements but the work involved in changing them and compensation for the time and inconvenience to those who awoke this morning to these unfortunate circumstances.
If Ms. Bebko-Jones is found guilty in her case, she must be held accountable for her actions. The same for others in positions of public trust who are tried and found guilty of criminal activity.
Ian
July 14th, 2008 at 11:20 am
yeah, but the legislators are the ones who have to pass the legislation making the penalties worse…is that gonna happen? Nooo….
Jim
July 14th, 2008 at 4:07 pm
What the legislature does, or doesn’t do is one thing. But my concern is that it doesn’t seem to matter what the law says when it comes to negotiating criminal cases. Guilt or innocence takes a back seat to what can be negotiated. So you don’t receive what you deserve, rather you get whatever you can negotiate. And that runs through our courts from top to bottom, and public officials are no better or worse at the practice than any other element.
Another question, how can one swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, when a judge decides in advance the jury can only hear 40% of the story. I used to think I had an understanding of what got excluded and why. No longer. Negotiations to exclude damaging evidence seems to be the norm these days.