by Peter Panepento
The Erie Times-News’ three-part series on General Electric Co.’s grant to the school system in Louisville is worth checking out if you care about Erie and its future.
The series, which kicks off today and runs through Tuesday, shows how the company’s grant has impacted students in Louisville.
Why does this matter to Erie?
The reason is simple. GE recently decided to give the Erie School District a similar $15 million grant — largely to help improve the performance of students in science and math.
The goal is to help teach the next generation the skills they need to become productive scientists and engineers — the kind of professionals that GE Transportation and other Erie companies need to remain competitive.
“If the grants help districts push more students on to college — and if those students become mathematicians, scientists or engineers — GE has a ready-made pool of homegrown talent,” Erie Times-News reporter Erica Erwin writes in the first part of the series.
With any luck, some of the students who benefit from this grant will decide to make their lives in Erie. In an ideal world, they will help not only GE Transportation, but other local companies develop new products and processes that will add value to Erie’s economy for decades to come.
How can the Erie School District best leverage this grant? If you’ve seen or experienced education programs that have improved students’ math and science skills, I invite you to share the details of these experiences. We’d love to hear about best practices.
After more than six years working as a journalist in Erie, I'm now the web editor for the Chronicle of Philanthropy in Washington, D.C., and the publisher of GlobalErie.com. I still maintain close ties to Erie - a community that I care about deeply. I hope this Web site can help inspire a better future for Erie.
Mark
January 7th, 2008 at 2:12 am
Just a thought…
This is way out there, but I think Erie should open a hands-on learning academy for the City of Erie and surrounding school districts. Hands-on learning is the number one way in regards to learning techniques and it is so undervalued. Thats obviously why GE created the grant
Why spend gaming money on a community college when a community college already exists. Our school districts are failing our children in many different academic areas. Plus, Erie needs its students to graduate from high school first.
This academy could feature hands-on activites for all academic areas. Hands-on learing is even more important when it comes to inner city youth. Many public school students come from broken homes with one or no parents present. This leads to hands-on learning. If no one is present to teach you new things, you learn thru trial and error, essentially hands-on.
Erie already has the perfect setting. Erie has three colleges/university’s in the surrounding area, plus a community college. Just imagine if education majors could have the oppurtunity to be assistant instructors at this academy. Not only would the school district children have the oppurtunity for hands-on learning, but college students would recieve hands-on teaching experience before they graduate.
Who knows, maybe it would become a global phenomenon, but I know for sure that everyone would benefit greatly.
Dale
January 7th, 2008 at 11:48 am
Is it correct to assume that GE, in making such a contribution to the Erie School District, is also going to have input in the areas in which the funds may be utilized? Since this sort of teaching experience is new to the ESD, perhaps the leadership of GE would be essential to ensuring
that the value of the fund is maximized in terms of proper programming and hands-on teaching assistance by working professionals in the technological fields which would be of the most benefit to the community.
Jim
January 7th, 2008 at 3:25 pm
I certainly hope this amounts to something positive for the Erie economy, however; I have my doubts.
I believe that Erie business and industry, for a multitude of reasons, has lagged the national economy in terms of investments in productivity enhancing technology and procedures, of the kind that require better educated or trained employees.
I’ve listened to several presentations over the past couple of years, (and plan to attend another one this week)which made a strong case for the Erie area being behind the nation in terms of our productivity per worker. (That is not a slam on workers.)To me that speaks to the lack of investment being made in Erie.
I have believed for years that our top economic priority has to be aimed at increasing private investment. To do that I think we need lower costs of government, shorter depreciation periods, increased access to local credit and capital, and less community opposition to growth and expansion of jobs producing endeavors.
I put what G.E. is doing into the same category as the community college effort, only done with private dollars as opposed to tax dollars. Great idea, but will it translate into job opportunities?
How many Penn State Behrend engineering graduates are leaving Erie to find employment?
As a former school board member, and vocational operating committee member, I certainly am a supporter of the life long learning concept. But I also believe that unless we start investing in competitive jobs producing ventures, these proposed educational expenditures will fall short of their potential.
Dale
January 7th, 2008 at 7:23 pm
I would hope that the programs would start in lower grades to bring the students along with the skills needed to achieve success on the college level, perhaps enticing more qualified students to opt for a degree in one of the high-paying fields. If GE were to have an active part in the curriculum, and possibly even offer high school students a short internship it could encourage top achievers to enter the technical fields which are sadly in need. Then hire them after college with a good salary, safe in the knowledge that they are properly grounded.
GE is a world class industry, working for the future, with their foray into the wind industry. I don’t believe they can just give the grant to the school district and expect the outcome to be what they hoped for, unless they have a very large part in developing and implementing a plan.
Ian Enterline
January 7th, 2008 at 7:43 pm
I think this all bodes well for Erie either way. It is true that Erie lags behind other cities in job growth and education. However, this grant shows that General Electric is looking to its future growth (along with Erie’s future) by investing this money. I agree with the other blogger that costs of government need to be brought to a lower level.
The amount of taxes in the Erie area keeps rising and that will lower the economic viability of creating new jobs. The GE grant to Erie schools show that GE is dedicated to creating a self-sustaining pool of trained people for it’s Erie operation, which is something Erie can be very proud of.
Wizo
January 7th, 2008 at 9:09 pm
I hope one part of your series touches on the most important recent event to happen in Loiusville.
“Louisville has pulled off the most significant municipal consolidation in 30 years.”
“Louisville officials chose to highlight the positive impacts in seven areas - saving money; streamlining services; encouraging innovative solutions; forging more effective partnerships; improving the focus for economic development; ‘bigger-picture’ thinking and planning; and attracting better talent to government.”
http://www.brookings.edu/opinions/2005/0123metropolitanpolicy_katz.aspx
ironically, while writing this I had current tv on and this pod popped up:
http://current.com/items/88807017_show_me_your_louisville
Peter Panepento
January 7th, 2008 at 10:09 pm
Wizo:
I’m not sure if the Times series is covering that aspect, but I know that Louisville’s regional government is a concept that has been discussed as a story topic at the newspaper.
I’m glad you brought it up and I’d love for anyone with Louisville connections to share their impressions of what that move has meant for Louisville.
Erie BlogWatch
January 8th, 2008 at 2:37 pm
All of the commenters express their thoughts sincerely, coherently, and rationally which is always welcome. However, I think Jim’s remarks are the most “on-target”.
A follow-up story in the ETN since your original post did describe some of the linkages between the GE Foundation grant and their expectations for its implementation. I am encouraged by the emphasis on oversight and results. Too often, it’s business as usual for government entities like the Erie School District and the money might as well be dumped in the hopper of the tires-to-enery plant for all the good it ends up doing for students and the community. Perhaps this will be a different story. I sure hope so. However, I can’t help but get the feeling that Superintendent Barker and the others at the ESD admin. bldg. are parroting the buzzwords about 6-sigma, accountability, etc. without really grasping what it means. Much like new members of a 12-step program after their first meeting, or at least that’s the impression which I took away.
One final thought while we’re on the subject of 6 sigma methodology. While it can work wonders for an industrial organization like GE, there is one key difference between the factory floor and the schoolhouse. Private industry has complete control over its suppliers and the raw materials with which it chooses to fashion its finished products. If a vendor fails to meet GE’s expectations or to show continuous improvement, they know that they cannot take GE’s business for granted too much longer.
Given a volatile brew of legislative fiats; long-established institutional corruption; organized labor backed by even more government involvement; disinterested parents; and general apathy on the part of the stockholders (whoops, taxpayers), I’m not sure a comparable environment or set of motivators and enablers exists for public education in this context.
Here’s hoping for the best, however